Pia has grown up in a secret laboratory hidden deep in the Amazon rain forest. She was raised by a team of scientists who have created her to be the start of a new immortal race. But on the night of her seventeenth birthday, Pia discovers a hole in the electric fence that surrounds her sterile home—and sneaks outside the compound for the first time in her life.
Free in the jungle, Pia meets Eio, a boy from a nearby village. Together, they embark on a race against time to discover the truth about Pia’s origin—a truth with deadly consequences that will change their lives forever.
-cover and synopsis courtesy of goodreads.com
Atmospheric Analysis: I absolutely adore this cover. The entire novel is designed with the same techy font effects. The colors are striking and appropriate. I even love how Pia’s outline is realistically hippy rather than unrealistically thin.
Planetary Class: Sean’s been jockeying for the acceptance of the term “contemporary science fiction” in our parlance for awhile. Origin, set in our world, in the modern Amazon rainforest, seems like a prime candidate for that label.
Viability Rating: Khoury’s world starts scientifically plausible, but grows progressively less-so. Her entire premise rests on a sort of communal Stockholm Syndrome, lasting generations, which I’m not quite sure I bought. But my biggest “wait, that’s not right!” moment came during a passage which seemed to suggest that cerebral palsy is a progressive disease.
Mohs Scale: Origin starts reasonably hard and grows softer over time. On a whole, I’d call it a four for Physics Plus.
Xenolinguisical Assessment: Khoury’s debut is a nice example first-person done right. The entire novel is infused with both Pia’s voice and her (admittedly flawed) view of the universe. The prose is at times pretty, but also very real. Nicely accomplished writing overall.
Expanded Report: There are books you respect for how well they’re crafted–their pace, strong voice and vivid characters. There are novels with themes you believe in, which expand your thinking on a subject in a new and thrilling way. And then there are certain books that do one, or the other, but not both; there are novels you admire, but don’t very well like because what they say about the world is abhorrent to you. For me, Origin is one of those novels.
For the good: this is one of the most immersively atmospheric young adult novels I’ve read in a long time. The pacing, breathlessly engaging, and easily matches Beth Revis’s Across the Universe, one of my favorites. Debut author Jessica Khoury presents one of the most distinctive and perfectly realized characters in Pia, an immortal girl raised by a team of scientists in a secret lab in the Amazon rainforest. Khoury’s prose is lovely and lyrical, drawing a vivid picture of Pia and her environs. She’s a confidant writer.
I just can’t get behind what she wrote about.
The overwhelming message of Origin is “the thirst for scientific knowledge makes scientists do evil things.” To be fair, this is a somewhat classical message in science fiction, one that’s understandably been with us since Hiroshima. And it’s been particularly popular in recent pop sci-fi. Lost, for example, which Origin both evokes and conspicuously lifts certain plot points (one female scientist’s backstory perfectly matches Juliet’s) seemed to have at its heart an anti-science argument. Those behind Lost have since gone on to create other media where scientists are bumbling or evil: Fringe is in many ways the story of one scientist’s atonement for evil acts. Prometheus presented a world where scientific curiosity leads inevitably to ruin. In fact, in interviews, Damon Lindelof stated that he felt science fiction fundamentally is a cautionary tale. As suggested in Lost itself, we should just have faith, and stop asking questions.
Khoury takes a slightly different route in portraying science as evil. She simply chooses to make the scientists in her story the evilest evil people ever. They raise Pia with a wealth of scientific knowledge, but none about the outside world. They tell her that she will be a scientist, and implore her to embrace a method of cold rationality which includes murdering kittens. I am not making this up. In fact, the scientists are portrayed as so flatly evil that, when characters allude to a mysterious catalyst which make immortality possible, I said to myself, “these scientists are so evil, I bet it comes from eating babies.” I wasn’t far off.
(To be fair, there are two mildly good scientists. It was not enough to counteract the EVIL SCIENCE IS EVIL message for me.)
I recently attended a con panel on dystopian YA fiction; there, it was suggested that modern YA dystopias are dark because teens live in uncertain times. I understand that Khoury, fairly young herself, coming of age in an era when the evils of, say, stem cell research are frequently in the news, but when it comes down to it, her scientists are nothing like the passionate, curious, engaged, kind scientists that I know in my own life. The message, and its lack of nuance, felt close to an affront.
There are other ways in which Origin reminded me of Lost, particularly in the inexplicable cageyness of certain characters. There was a scene where Pia shouts at one to tell her information and he tells her over and over again that he can’t. But he could. The deflection only served to postpone the reveal of information to where it was most impactful, but it didn’t make much sense.
But still, this is a finely crafted novel, and Khoury is a powerful writer. I just don’t agree, personally, with what she wrote about. Those who enjoy sci-fi as a cautionary tale (I’m looking at you, Damon Lindelof!) will find quite a bit to like here.
Origin comes out September 4 and is available for preorder from Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and your local indie bookstore.
I’m also giving away my signed ARC of Origin! Fill out the Rafflecopter below to enter.



As always, good stuff, Phoebe. I’ve been a bit weary about approaching this book partly because of the anti-science bent I saw frequently associated with it, not to mention the lofty Lost comparison (my dad’s a huge Lost fanboy) and the potential for less than progressive race issues. The blurb felt a little reminiscent of the “white girl saves the poor grateful natives” narrative. How does Khuory deal with that?
Quote
It’s actually closer to “noble savage” than “white girl saves the natives.” Of course, the native population uses plant-based medicine and knows the real truth, which science is closed to, etc. etc.
Quote
Thanks for the giveaway! This was a great review.
I read the first couple of pages a while back, and it started off a little slow to me but the premise is very interesting, so I’m curious to see where the story goes. Also, I really like the term ‘contemporary science fiction’. Hopefully it gets picked up in the future because that’s how I would describe my current wip.
Quote
Sounds like an interesting book. Excellent review. Thanks for the opportunity.
Quote
Thanks for the review. This has been in my TBR wish list for a while.
Quote
I’ve been hearing so much about Origin and I cannot wait to read it! Fantastic giveaway!
Quote
A couple years ago, I really loved the Maximum Ride series. Recently, I read it, and I kind of hated it. Its writing was flimsy at best, only giving cheap jokes to make it readable, the characters were inconsistent and unrealistic (how could anyone possibly fall in love with someone they’ve grown up thinking of that person as their brother?), and it showed an incredibly unrealistic view of how evil scientists were. There was one scientist that rescued them, but once they found out he’d gone back to the school, he was evil again in the book, and no one questioned it. This seems kind of like that, only more faith-oriented as opposed to just SCIENTISTS ARE EVIL! I won’t be entering the giveaway, because judging by this, I would absolutely hate it.
Quote
I totally agree with everything you’ve said about the Maximum Ride books. Loved then when I first read then, but now they’re teeth-achingly bad. I don’t know why James Patterson also writes romance, because judging from the romance in MR, they must be terrible. God, I hate these books so much now.
Quote
I think I’m gonna have to take a look at this book and see what I think. I do like science as a cautionary tale books, but this might be a little over the top for me. (Considering I was a science major and have done a bit of research, so I’m kinda a fan of experimentation/seeing what we can do/expanding knowledge).
I’m also a fan of the term ‘contemporary sci-fi.’ I think it’s a valid description and actually just picked up a copy of Replication (but haven’t read it yet). It’ll be fun to compare these two books.
Quote
This sounds like a brilliant read. I am a huge fan of sci-fi, so this immediately appeals to m. Can’t wait to see if she expands more in the sequel.
Quote
I’m curious to read this. Coming from a science-based background, I am wary of “science is evil” viewpoints — but there have been books with such theme that I enjoyed. Since the writing is good, I might give this a try.
Quote
I’m not entirely positive, but I think I read some of this somewhere in another review and I had forgotten the title, but I had remembered the one of the names was something like “Eos” and when I read your review, I was thinking “is this it?? Is this the book I was looking forward to getting when it came out??” I don’t think the passages I read gave me this idea of science being evil, so that’s why I’m not sure if it’s the same one, but I was very interested anyway and I can’t wait to read it!
Quote
The love interest is named Eio, so this is likely what you’re thinking of.
Quote
I’ve been looking forward to this one–thanks for the giveaway!
Quote
I read the first couple chapters of this on Beth Revis’s blog a few months ago, and it was pretty good. I’m sorry to hear that it gets worse, though. Still, it sounds like an interesting read.
Quote
i can’t wait to read this book. thanks for the opportunity
Quote